Reducción por reserva de capitalización

Change of DGT approach: situation before the new TEAC ruling

In the field of R&D tax credits under Corporate Income Tax (CIT), the retroactive application of R&D tax deductions has been the subject of intense legal debate in recent years due to a change of position by the Directorate-General for Taxation (DGT), which directly affected companies with unused tax benefits pending application.

Until consultations V1510-22 and V1511-22, both dated 24 June 2022, the DGT allowed taxpayers to claim unused deductions from prior years in their current return, without the need to file amended returns, provided they remained within the 18-year statutory period for application.

However, following these consultations, the DGT reversed its position and required the rectification of the original self-assessments in which the R&D expenses were generated, thereby limiting retroactive application to the last four years (statute of limitations).

This shift prompted an appeal before the Supreme Court (TS) to resolve two key questions regarding the retroactive application of R&D tax credits:

  1. Whether expenses incurred in prior years, but not included in the self-assessment, could still be used as the basis for a deduction.
  2. Whether it was mandatory to rectify the original self-assessments in order to claim the deduction.


In its judgment 4355/2023 of 24 October 2023, the Supreme Court confirmed that deductions from previous years may be applied without rectification, even if the returns are time-barred, as long as they remain within the 18-year period.

However, this ruling applied only to the specific claimant and did not establish general doctrine, which meant the DGT and the AEAT (Spanish Tax Agency) continued to uphold their restrictive interpretation.

The practical impact of this gap: uncertainty and loss of deductions

During this period, many taxpayers were affected by legal uncertainty, particularly those who had not applied past deductions and later could not amend their returns due to prescription, thereby losing legitimate R&D tax benefits.

This situation was perceived as a violation of the principle of legitimate expectation, since taxpayers had acted in line with a criterion that had been valid for years.

New TEAC ruling: definitive unification of the criterion

The Central Economic-Administrative Court (TEAC), in its ruling of 17 July 2025, has now unified the criterion and clarified the situation once and for all.

It recognised that the 2022 consultations explicitly changed the previous criterion, thereby breaking the legitimate expectation created by earlier binding rulings (V802-2011, V0297-2012 and V2400-2014).

Two different scenarios are established:

A) Self-assessments filed after 24 June 2022

  • Taxpayers must rectify their returns if they failed to include the deduction.They can no longer invoke legitimate expectation, as the new criterion was already in force at the time of filing.

  • They can no longer invoke legitimate expectation, as the new criterion was already in force at the time of filing.


B) Self-assessments filed before 24 June 2022

  • In these cases, legitimate expectation is protected.

  • Taxpayers cannot now be required to have included the deductions in the original year.

  • They may still apply them, as long as they remain within the statutory period.


The same approach is confirmed in the TEAC resolution of 17 July 2025, RG 1267-2025, issued in an extraordinary appeal for unification of criteria.

Practical application of the TEAC ruling on retroactive R&D tax credits

The TEAC has finally resolved a key legal uncertainty. From now on, any company with R&D tax credits generated in 2020 or earlier, and which neither applied nor rectified them, may still apply them in its CIT return for 2025, provided that:

  • The deductions remain within the 18-year statutory period.

  • The company holds adequate documentary and technical evidence.


It is strongly advisable to obtain ENAC-accredited certifications, which substantiate the reality, amount and qualification of the R&D project, thereby reducing the risk of the Tax Authority challenging the deduction.

These certifications may still be obtained now, provided the company retains the necessary documentation (projects, expenses, contracts, etc.)

Do you need advice? Access our area related to R&D&I tax relief rebates:

Tax Advice

5/5 - (1 vote)

Post Relacionados

Blog, Commercial Law, Hospitality, Real Estate Law
Contratos hoteleros contrato de gestión, contrato de arrendamiento y contrato de franquicia hotelera (1)

Hotel contracts: management agreement, lease agreement and hotel franchise agreement

Hotel contracts acquire special relevance in a context in which tourism in Spain is one of the most profitable sectors with the greatest economic projection, particularly foreign tourism. According to the Ministry of Industry and Tourism, expenditure by international tourists exceeded 105 billion euros up to September 2025, 7% more than in the same period […]
Read more
Blog, Laboral, Labour Law
Claves para las empresas ante el Plan Estratégico de la Inspección de Trabajo 2025-2027 (2)

Key considerations for business in light of the Labour Inspectorate’s Strategic Plan 2025-2027

Understanding the new Strategic Plan of the Labour and Social Security Inspectorate 2025-2027 The recent publication of the Strategic Plan of the Labour and Social Security Inspectorate (ITSS) for 2025–2027 marks the start of a new cycle of inspection activity characterised by digitalisation, large-scale data analysis, and increased specialisation in specific sectors and organisational models. […]
Read more
Blog, mercantil, Tax
Tributacion del vendedor en la venta de una compañia

Taxation of the seller in the sale of a company: individual shareholder vs holding company shareholder

Taxation-wise, the sale of a company can be one of the most significant decisions in an entrepreneur’s business life. It is not merely the completion of a corporate transaction, but rather the culmination of years of effort, strategy, and value creation. For this reason, the seller’s tax position in the transaction is also crucial. In […]
Read more
Blog, Tax law
Fondo oscuro

Murcia High Court: The mass cloning of computer equipment may constitute a violation of fundamental rights

Violation of fundamental rights in inspection actions on computer equipment The Murcia High Court has issued a ruling on 16 October 2025, in a case handled by our firm, which represents a significant milestone in the judicial oversight of inspection actions when they affect the entire contents of computer equipment. The Court declares that the […]
Read more
Contacta / Contact us